We’re talking about germs, not carbs.Read More →
We’re talking about germs, not carbs.Read More →
Another questionable college sexual assault investigation winds up in court.
Lindsay Marchello writes:
Augustana University and a former student expelled in the wake of a Title IX sexual assault investigation in 2015 have agreed to a dismiss…Read More →
While Arnold dings Donald on Charlottesville, Breitbart readies for “WAR”Read More →
Steve Bannon, Trump’s controversial chief strategist and former Breitbart head, has been forced out of the White House. Mainstream Republicans have expressed relief at his departure. Breitbart commenters have not.
Britain slowly cobbles t…Read More →
CNN looks back at Cuban conflict and catches up.Read More →
A textbook case of good intentions gone awryRead More →
And all sides are talking past each otherRead More →
An ACLU critic argues that the group must forsake freedom of speech in order to save it.Read More →
The Department of Justice says it’s shutting down the dragnet program that targeted porn makers, payday lenders, gun shops, and other small businesses.Read More →
If government censorship is the fear, then we must protect private free association.Read More →
Seattle Mayor Ed Murray has called for the removal of the Vladimir Lenin statue in the neighborhood of Fremont. In New York City, Mayor Bill de Blasio has launched a 90-day review of “all symbols of hate on city property”; his eyes seem to have settled on a plaque commemorating Philippe Pétain, the Nazi-aligned leader of Vichy France.
Both moves come in the wake of a national discussion on Confederate statues, and both moves miss the mark completely. Statues for Confederate generals frequently went up during periods of heightened racial tension. They were sometimes meant specifically to intimidate local black populations, and they often had that effect whether that was the intent or not. If a Lenin statue was put up in, say, a neighborhood where Eastern Europeans were starting to move, it could represent something else. But it wasn’t.
The plaque mentioning Philippe Pétain is found at the Canyon of Heroes, a section of Lower Broadway ithat has been the site of more than 200 ticker-tape parades since the late 19th century. Pétain received a parade there in 1931 as a French military hero; he had been named a Marshall of France, a military distinction given to generals for exceptional achievements. This was about a decade before he collaborated with the Nazis. His plaque, which identifies the date he received his parade, was not taken down in the three-and-a-half-year period when U.S. soldiers were actually fighting Nazi Germany. Removing it would represent precisely what the opponents of taking down Confederate monuments say they’re afraid of: erasing history. The man really did receive that parade, and the plaque establishes that event.
Taking down Seattle’s Lenin statue would make even less sense. It’s a statue that had already been taken down—in 1989, in Czechoslovakia after the Velvet Revolution. It was found in a scrap heap by an American English teacher living abroad, who convinced the authorities to sell it to him and who then spent tens of thousands of dollars to ship it to the U.S. He wanted to use it to promote a restaurant he planned to open.
The statue was placed in a retail area in Fremont in 1995, and it has officially been on sale ever since. (It can be yours for $250,000.) It is essentially a surreal joke. It has become a tourist attraction, not for communist sympathizers but for people who enjoy seeing weird things; it is now a symbol of the character of the neighborhood, whose motto is Latin for “the freedom to be peculiar.”
State Sen. Reuven Carlyle (D-Seattle), whose family came from Poland in the 1920s, has defended the Lenin statue. “Unlike the Confederacy statues throughout our nation built to formally honor those in that battle of ideas, this statue is distinctly not showcased in Fremont to celebrate the murderous, painful regime,” Carlyle wrote on his blog. “The statue was, simply, installed with artistic intent to show that our very ability to install political art is the triumph of democracy over tyranny.”
He continued: “Art can be offensive and painful, but it can also bring us alive with curiosity, wonder, knowledge. Installing a political statue of a man and regime that would never allow installation of political statues of opponents is a symbolic representation of the victory of democracy and freedom over oppression. And of the role of art itself.”
It is also private property standing on private land, so Seattle’s mayor shouldn’t have any say about whether it stays or goes. What is he, some kind of communist?
Read More →
The president isn’t attacking P.C., as he once promised. He’s sanctioned its use among his followers.Read More →
After a large jury verdict award over a rapist cop, the Orange County Sheriff’s Department says it’s looking into changing its policies.
Steven Greenhut writes:
If the Orange County, Calif., Board of Supervisors votes to appeal the $2.25 mil…Read More →