The Destruction of America From Within: Agenda 21 and Liberals

April 9, 2012   |   Tags:

I’m against Agenda 21. I understand the concepts – we only have one earth and we need to live in harmony with it, we need to manage our resources, etc. – yes, yes, I get it. But, upon examination, it promotes a one world government, which must include the destruction of America. I’m against it. And you should be, too.

Developed by the United Nations (trouble right there) Agenda 21 promotes the idea of sustainable development and communitarian-ism. In short, it is presented to us common folk as a way to save the earth from the mean selfish humans. Agenda 21 will right all the wrongs, add equality, harmony and tranquility to the human existence and create a social utopia. Rubbish! In reality, it is the left’s push toward a one world government. Don’t be fooled, the one world government concept is not a conspiracy theory. We’ll touch on more of that shortly.

The masterminds behind Agenda 21 used global warming to sell it to the masses. I say used, because the message has changed, as we will see. You’ve heard of it, global warming that is, the idea that there’s too much CO2 in the air and the ice-caps are melting, thus bringing about the end of the world unless we make drastic changes.

In 2009, documents were released that showed the global warming buzz is a hoax. Scientists, paid by agenda driven financiers, included slanted data to generate reports that had predetermined results (much like a lawyer might hire an “expert” witness for testimony – ‘yes your honor, he is insane’). By the way, it’s still occurring. Misinformation works, why dump a good technique, right?

Unfortunately, by the time the truth came out about the scam, Agenda 21 had already been initiated (those dastardly villains always being johnny-on-the-spot). But, with the debunking of global warming, our dubious lot hit an obstacle. Namely, if you want to justify radical social change because of a trigger (global warming) and then the trigger goes away, there’s no need for the radical social change. Clearly, that’s an obstacle. So what are power-hungry elitists to do? You guessed it, change the reasoning. Edit the story. Move from global warming to environmental issues like too much pollution, too many people, not enough food, too little habitat – that will work. And, because they’re crafty evil masterminds, they throw in some financial and political chaos, you know, as insurance.

Agenda 21 was ratified by George Bush, Sr., and it is being implemented without your consent. How? Bill Clinton established the Presidential Council for Sustainable Development, by executive order, thereby effectively side-stepping Congress and the American people. Stop here a moment and ask yourself, if global warming and over-population and resource management and all the other issues lefties toss into the pot, are so self-evident and so critical, why did Clinton have to use an executive order? Why not have a national discussion and allow the people and Congress to have a voice?

It is organized and promoted by all nature of creepy creatures (the United Nations, George Soros, ICLEI, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and many more) with an agenda of establishing, as stated earlier, a new world order. The goal is to create a one world government that recognizes no national sovereignty and is ruled by, of course, the special few that help make it happen. Politics is politics after all.

It sounds like a Bond movie, doesn’t it? Anyway, it is in conflict with our American way of life (if not our actual existence – I’ll touch on that nugget soon). It is in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution. Make no mistake, Agenda 21 is bad for the America you know. It attacks our laws, property rights, food, water, soil, vaccines, manufacturing and on and on and on. I know it’s hard to imagine, but there is no stone unturned. It is an insidious weed, that will, if left unchecked, grow throughout the foundation of the system and utterly and completely disfigure this country (of course, there will be no country because that’s the point). To fully communicate the magnitude of Agenda 21 would require a book. So, with your permission, I will highlight just a few more things.

Agenda 21, ratified in 1992, is twenty years old this year. It is a healthy and strapping young lad ready to enter its prime. And our villains are pushing it right along.

As an example of how Agenda 21 strikes at the heart of America through the use of government policy, I give you this short sample. The following is from a column by Dick Morris, on February 7, 2012, discussing President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton entering negotiations over the following treaties,

International Criminal Court — Clinton has reversed George W. Bush’s policy and entered into negotiations over U.S. participation in the court. Specifically, the leftists who are sponsoring the court wish to create a new crime of “aggression,” which is essentially going to war without the approval of the United Nations. If we submit to the court’s jurisdiction, our presidents and Cabinet officials could be prosecuted criminally for going to war without U.N. approval. This would, of course, give Russia and China a veto over our military actions. Clinton says she will stop our military’s hands from being tied, but we all must realize that once we accept the International Criminal Court, we go down a slippery slope. The court could even prosecute Americans who have been cleared by our own judicial system.

The Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) has been signed, and the Obama administration — with the aid of RINO Sen. Richard Lugar (Ind.) — will push for its ratification as soon as Lugar’s primary in Indiana is over this year. LOST requires that the United States pay an international body half of its royalties from offshore drilling. The body would then distribute the funds as it sees fit to whichever nations it chooses. The United States would only have one vote out of 160 regarding where the money goes. LOST will also oblige us to hand over our offshore drilling technology to any nation that wants it … for free.

Small-arms Control — Clinton is about to negotiate on a global ban on export of small arms. It would only apply to private citizens but, of course, most small-arms deals come not from individuals or private firms but from governments, specifically those of the United States, Russia, China and Israel. The treaty would require each nation to adopt measures to stop exportation of small arms. It is easy to see how this could be a backdoor way to require national registration of all guns and to assert federal regulation over firearms. It would also require the registration of all ammunition to track its source once a gun is fired. The Second Amendment be damned!

Outer Space Code of Conduct — Under the guise of stopping debris from accumulating in outer space, the European Union has enlisted Clinton in negotiations over a code of conduct. The code would prohibit activities that are likely to generate debris in outer space — space littering. The code might inhibit or prohibit the United States from deploying anti-missile missiles on platforms in space, denying us the key weapon we need to counter Iranian, Chinese and North Korean missile threats. European leftists reacted angrily when G.W. Bush opted out of the ABM treaty banning defensive weapons. Now they seek to reimpose it under the guise of a code of conduct.

Rights of the Child — Even more fanciful is a treaty Clinton plans to negotiate setting forth a code of rights for children, to be administered by a 14-member court set up for the purpose. The draft treaty obliges rich nations to provide funds for shelter, food, clothing and education for children in poor nations. This provision could create grounds to litigate to challenge the level of foreign aid we give as inadequate to meet our treaty obligations. Already, leftists in the United Kingdom are using the treaty to attack welfare cuts by the Cameron government. (continued, page 3 link below)

Ask yourself, why would any government official jeopardize the country’s ability to defend itself without U.N. approval? Why would any government official want our Commander-in-Chief to have to answer to someone else? Why would any government official, with America’s best interest in mind, commit to giving money or technology away? How is that putting America first?

The answer is simple. These folks are not putting America first. And so, I submit to you, the so called “One World Government conspiracy” so often mocked by the mainstream is in fact reality. Through the use of government policy at the federal, state and local levels (zoning regulations, building codes, tax policy, water management, transportation regulations, the change of legal definitions, food production limits, etc.) Agenda 21 is being implemented, every year and every month and re-defining America in every way. There’s a good chance Sustainable Development policies have been adopted by your town, city or county governments. And, as a final insult, because tax-payer money is used, American citizens are actually funding the demise of their country.

The spin is terrific. Who wouldn’t want world harmony, equality or utopia? Unfortunately, only the horribly naive believe utopia is possible. The powerful that promote it just seek to ensure they have a place at the table. The others that promote it are generally rabid dogs, crazed leftist zealots so blinded by their idealism that their rational thought has been exterminated. Whatever the motivation, these villains routinely stomp on the U.S. Constitution and throw you and your loved one’s in harms way. Unfortunately, there is more. Plenty.

You don’t think you get to utopia by just snapping your fingers, do you? No, no. You get there by “starting over”, by wiping out the old to establish the new. And this is where your hair is likely to stand up on the back of your neck.

A one world government, by definition, means existing governments must be abolished — by war, financial collapse, or self-defeating government policies. Have you seen any countries suffer from these things recently? Critical resources (food, water, oil, etc.) are confiscated and strictly managed (for the good of all, don’t you know); and the population is reduced, yes reduced, to a number deemed manageable and sustainable. And I bet the villains aren’t going to ask us what a good population size is, will they?

Ask yourself again, regarding the treaties, why would government officials that wanted to maintain America, sign up for those? The answer is they wouldn’t, unless they wanted to weaken the country to help make way for the new. There’s many more questions you can ask. Here’s a few to get you started.

Why are farmers in America and Europe, paid (or forced) to burn crops? Is it because there’s too much food or because economic and population reduction policies are being implemented?

Why did the Obama administration push so hard, in absolute defiance of the will of the people, to establish Obama-care? Is it because the Fed is so good at medicine or is it a control mechanism designed to have every American soul, at some point in their life, have to be at the mercy of the new government? You know exactly how it will work. If you are sick but young you get approved for treatment but if you are old, less productive, you get put on the waiting list. Unfortunately, it’s the waiting to die list.

Why did Bill Gates (yes, the Microsoft guy) mention using vaccines and changes in healthcare when discussing population reduction? I’ll repeat, population reduction. And what specific populations are going to be reduced?

Why is immigration always talked about, but never, ever, ever enforced by the government? Is it because they can’t or because it’s a basic step towards the removal of country borders?

Why do you think the Federal government insists on being involved with public education? Is it because they’re so good at it, or is it so they can control the text books and teach the young that America is nothing special and is just part of the world community?

Can it really be, as we have been told for the last 20 years or so, that politicians are “out of touch” with American citizens when they pass strange or head-scratching legislation, or could it be that they are actually following a structured path toward a one world government and America’s demise?

It is Agenda 21 and, more specifically, those that promote it that are helping destroy America from within. If you believe in liberty, personal freedom, private property — in short, if you believe in the American way of life, you must educate yourself about Agenda 21 and help stop it.

Is your local government a card-carrying member? Click the link and scroll down to the United States. (Note: it’s anybody’s guess when the list was last updated)


VIDEO INFORMATION: Agenda 21 and Tax-Payer Money / Glen Beck / Michael Shaw

(If you like this post, share it and help spread the word)


freedom bunker aggregates the best in libertarian news daily. please visit the source site for more information.

Join our team of 2235 Freedom Fighters.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Welcome Fellow Patriot

Sign up to receive FREEDOM BUNKER DAILY

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


About Post Author

I. M. Citizen

I consider myself a typical American. I value my family, friends and personal integrity. I enjoy some sports and a cold beer on a hot day. OK, several. I'll put some money on a pony now and then, too. I feel that America, as outlined by the Constitution, represents the greatest concept of government that humanity has conceived. However, this sound-bite based, PC, half-truth environment that our leaders, celebrities, unions and special interest groups have fostered is a fallacy and a farce. It is mocking those that gave their lives for this country, insulting the citizenry and ripping this country apart. I question government's intent on all levels and doubt its' competency with all enterprises. I believe small government is good government, I just can't decide whether it should be small or infinitesimal. Drop a line at

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments