The Left’s New Gun-Control Strategy

August 28, 2012   |   Tags:

Democrats have adopted a new strategy in their relentless pursuit of gun-control. Knowing national legislation is currently a losing proposition and also witnessing the NRA consistently beating back state level legislation, these power-hungry political hacks are trying to achieve gun-control at the local level.

Yes, crusaders, it is the county, city and town ordinances that are the new rave.

Sure, you can own a gun, these self-righteous politicians say, but you can’t carry it in the local park. Or you can own a gun but you can’t have it in your car. Or you can have it in your car but not if you park your car within city limits. You know — “No guns allowed.”

Ultimately, it is the same old tired technique of chip away-chip away. But the difference here is that Democrats are betting gun advocates will have a more difficult time confronting many, many local jurisdictions rather than just a given state trying to pass a law. It is a spread them thin approach — force gun-control opponents into hundreds of legal fights rather than just a few, in hopes of diminishing their resources.

Local jurisdictions within Pennsylvania are currently a beehive of gun-control activity.

“It’s an efficient strategy, said Richard Feldman, a former NRA lobbyist and current president of the Independent Firearm Owners Association. “I’d always rather fight any battle in a state capital than in 15 or 50 county areas,” he said.

The NRA and other gun advocacy groups are counter-attacking with state legislation designed to limit local legislation. For example, last year Florida passed a law that would allow politicians to be removed from office for adopting “their own” local gun laws.

“It’s not going away,” John Linder, Mayor of Chester, Pennsylvania said. “The NRA is not going to relent.”

Nor should it. It’s a sad commentary on our leadership when laws have to be passed to protect against politicians making laws that break existing laws.

As Bloomberg reports, “Pennsylvania law bars local governments from regulating the lawful ownership, possession or transportation of firearms. District attorneys say the towns’ ordinances…conflict with state law.”

So it seems these Democratic Mayors are breaking the law, at least in Pennsylvania, when they make gun-control laws.

Of course, they sell it differently.

“We continue to fight the fight realizing we don’t have enough political clout to win the battle,” said Allentown Mayor Ed Pawlowski, a Democrat. “All we’re trying to do is protect our citizens.”

Protect your citizens? No, Mr. Pawlowski, what you’re trying to do is skirt the 2nd amendment. And that’s being kind. There exist people out there that feel you are actually committing treason by attacking the Constitution.

Additionally, we are not your citizens. The actual relationship is that you are our elected official. You answer to us. Apparently, you’ve lost a little perspective. The reason the founders included the 2nd amendment was so that, if necessary, we could remove politicians that lost perspective. Regardless of your personal delusions, Mr. Pawlowski, Allentown is not your little kingdom where you can wave a scepter and institute what you want, when you want.

In America, Mr. Pawlowski, the people and the Constitution are in charge.

Follow I.M. Citizen on Facebook or visit at

freedom bunker aggregates the best in libertarian news daily. please visit the source site for more information.

Join our team of 2235 Freedom Fighters.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Welcome Fellow Patriot

Sign up to receive FREEDOM BUNKER DAILY

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


About Post Author

I. M. Citizen

I consider myself a typical American. I value my family, friends and personal integrity. I enjoy some sports and a cold beer on a hot day. OK, several. I'll put some money on a pony now and then, too. I feel that America, as outlined by the Constitution, represents the greatest concept of government that humanity has conceived. However, this sound-bite based, PC, half-truth environment that our leaders, celebrities, unions and special interest groups have fostered is a fallacy and a farce. It is mocking those that gave their lives for this country, insulting the citizenry and ripping this country apart. I question government's intent on all levels and doubt its' competency with all enterprises. I believe small government is good government, I just can't decide whether it should be small or infinitesimal. Drop a line at

1 Comment
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments